This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were cereal bars aimed at young children zero-rated foodstuffs or standard rated confectionary?

By Andrew Needham, June 2021

This was an appeal against HMRC decision to refuse a voluntary disclosure for £1,000,163 in relation to the Nakd bars and £97,162 in relation to the Organix bars which they ruled as being standard rated confectionary rather than zero-rated as cakes as claimed by the appellant. 

Summary 

This was an appeal against HMRC decision to refuse a voluntary disclosure for £1,000,163 in relation to the Nakd bars and £97,162 in relation to the Organix bars which they ruled as being standard rated confectionary rather than zero-rated as cakes as claimed by the appellant. 

Background 

The appellant submitted that: 

(1) although sweet fruit juice was added to the Organix bars, its primary purpose was to bind the other ingredients rather than to add sweetness; <>

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were cooked marshmallows normally eaten with the fingers or from a stick or skewer?
By Andrew Needham, May 2026
Was the supply of vitamin drops and booster shots an exempt supply of medical treatment or a standard-rated supply?
By Andrew Needham, July 2025
Did the appellant make exempt supplies of services or standard-rated supplies of management services?
By Andrew Needham, December 2023
Were the appellants liable to a penalty and were personal liability notices appropriate?
By Andrew Needham, November 2023
Did a houseboat qualify as a new dwelling for VAT purposes?
By Andrew Needham, November 2020