This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were HMRC Reasonable To Issue A Notice Of Requirement (NoR)?

By Andrew Needham, March 2019

This was an appeal by the taxpayer against a decision by HMRC to issue a NoR to provide a security. 
 
The Appellant is 100% owned by Mr Samady and its trading activity is noted as being buying and selling real estate. 

HMRC considered that the Appellant represented a risk to the Exchequer due to a number of factors: 

  1. The company had VAT debts of £103,070.78, which included default surcharges of £13,382.45, and a PAYE debt of £96,760.39. 
  2. There had been 10 default periods and the default surcharge rate had been at the 15% rate since 11/16. 
  3. A related company, 37 Victoria Road Ltd, and which was also owned by Mr Samady, had a VAT debt of £411,695.51. 
  4. Another related company, CNM Estates
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were the supplies of education supplied by the three higher educational bodies exempt from VAT?
By Andrew Needham, June 2025
Were mobile ride-hailing services within scope or not?
By Andrew Needham, June 2025
Did the input tax claimed by the appellant have a direct and immediate link to the making of taxable supplies?
By Andrew Needham, November 2024
Was the appellant entitled to be registered for VAT or not?
By Andrew Needham, March 2023
Were claims for mis sold PPI within the insurance exemption?
By Andrew Needham, October 2021