This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the appellant entitled to be registered for VAT or not?

By Andrew Needham, March 2023

This was an appeal against a decision by HMRC to refuse to register the appellant for VAT and the subsequent striking out of the appeal by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT). 

Summary 

This was an appeal against a decision by HMRC to refuse to register the appellant for VAT and the subsequent striking out of the appeal by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT). 

Background 

The FTT’s decision to strike out the appellant’s appeal against a 2020 registration rejection was made on the grounds that the FTT had a discretion to strike out an appellant’s case if the FTT “considers there is no reasonable prospect of the appellant’s case, or part of it, succeeding” and that it was an abuse of process. The appellant’s previous registration had been cancelled in 2017 on the grounds that it was utilised solely or principally for abusive purposes. 

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was repayment supplement due on monies repaid to the appellant by HMRC or was repayment made within relevant period?
By Andrew Needham, February 2024
Was admission to the Great Yorkshire Show exempt under the fundraising exemption?
By Andrew Needham, July 2023
Did the construction of a standalone extension qualify as the construction of a new residential property?
By Andrew Needham, April 2023
Education exemption: Was a profit-making education business a college of a university?
By Andrew Needham, July 2019
Was VAT Only Due On ‘Commissions’ Received Or The Full Value Of The Sale?
By Andrew Needham, February 2019