This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Did the input tax claimed by the appellant have a direct and immediate link to the making of taxable supplies?

By Andrew Needham, November 2024

The appellant appealed a decision of HMRC to disallow the recovery of input tax on legal fees on the grounds that they did not have a direct and immediate link to the making of taxable supplies by the appellant. 

The appellant’s main business activity is to invest in start-up businesses and to provide consultancy services to help them to reach their full potential and, hence, maximise their investment values.  

The appellant argued that the input tax could be claimed as these legal services were for the purpose of the business because the company was making a claim against the directors of Simplestream Limited and TV Player Limited, companies that they had invested in, for removing the director appointed by the appellant and then liquidating the companies. 

The appellant had suffered loss in that it had been denied the value of their shares in these two companies together with the dividend payments to which it would

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was import VAT due or had it been accounted for through postponed VAT accounting?
By Andrew Needham, April 2026
Were hair transplants a medical procedure or a cosmetic process?
By Andrew Needham, April 2025
Was interest payable by HMRC on overpaid output tax paid on demonstrator bonuses?
By Andrew Needham, February 2023
Had the appellant undeclared cash sales?
By Andrew Needham, September 2021
Was input tax on building works recoverable by the appellant?
By Andrew Needham, July 2021