This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were Maga Marshmallows zero-rated food or standard-rated confectionary?

By Andrew Needham, June 2024

This was an appeal by HMRC against the decision of the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) allowing the taxpayer's appeal against HMRC's decision that supplies of its food product 'Mega Marshmallows' were standard-rated supplies of confectionery pursuant to Excepted Item 2 of Group 1 of Schedule 8 to the VAT Act 1994.  

The conclusion reached by the FTT was that Mega Marshmallows were not confectionery and that the supply was therefore zero-rated. The conclusion was based on the findings that Mega Marshmallows were sold and purchased as a product specifically for roasting. The FTT considered the marketing, the packaging, the size of the product, the positioning in supermarkets and the seasonal fluctuation in sales when reaching its findings. 

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) submitted that Note 5 was a deeming provision; if an item fell within a description in Note 5, it was automatically within the ambit of Item 2 and that is the end

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should the appellant have known that some of its transactions were connected with fraud and should it have been able to recover the input tax charged?
By Andrew Needham, June 2026
Was import VAT due or had it been accounted for through postponed VAT accounting?
By Andrew Needham, April 2026
Was admission to the Great Yorkshire Show exempt under the fundraising exemption?
By Andrew Needham, July 2023
Did the construction of a standalone extension qualify as the construction of a new residential property?
By Andrew Needham, April 2023
Bad debt relief: Was the appellant entitled to adjust its daily gross takings figure more than four years after the debt became due?
By Andrew Needham, February 2020