This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Had the appellant undeclared cash sales?

By Andrew Needham, September 2021

The appellant was a Chinese takeaway that was assessed for underdeclared takings on the basis of one invigilation carried out on a Friday. HMRC considered that the cash takings had been understated. 

HMRC argued that the invigilation undertaken on 10 March 2017 established a daily gross takings (‘DGT’) of £1,656.91, which was reflective of the appellant’s normal level of sales for Fridays. An average DGT of £1,082.94 was shown in previous takings for Fridays, over a three-year period. This, they argued, was reflective of a significant level of sales suppression by the appellant, although errors were recorded on the night of the invigilation. 

The appellant argued that: 

  • the DGT, on the day of the invigilation, covered both cash and card takings and was only evidence of an increase in sales generally;
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Did the appellant know or should they have known that the transaction was connected to fraud?
By Andrew Needham, June 2023
Did the construction of a standalone extension qualify as the construction of a new residential property?
By Andrew Needham, April 2023
Was interest payable by HMRC on overpaid output tax paid on demonstrator bonuses?
By Andrew Needham, February 2023
Was input tax on the purchase of doors recoverable when it did not result in an onward taxable supply?
By Andrew Needham, July 2021
Was the separate hire of a car seat a separate supply from the hire of the car?
By Andrew Needham, September 2020