This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were HMRC Unreasonable To Refuse A Belated Notification?

By Andrew Needham, October 2018

The appellant had agreed to purchase a property in early June 2016. On 30 June 2016, an informal board meeting took place to confirm the decision to purchase the property. Following that decision, they agreed to do the ‘necessary paperwork’, which included opting to tax the property, although the board minute did not specifically refer to the option to tax.

The appellant stated that the form VAT1614A (Notification of an option to tax) was completed on 1 July 2016 by the company’s management accountant and had been signed that day. The form had been sent by standard untracked post and no log of outgoing post was maintained due to the volume

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were the supplies made by the appellant exempt supplies of domiciliary care or standard-rated supplies of staff subject to the reverse charge?
By Andrew Needham, April 2026
Was the payment for use of the property an exempt supply of land or a standard-rated ‘management charge’?
By Andrew Needham, April 2025
Was the input tax directly linked to a taxable or exempt supply?
By Andrew Needham, October 2023
Was the appellant entitled to a repayment from HMRC for historical VAT on historical bad debts that it stated it had not claimed?
By Andrew Needham, May 2023
Was interest payable by HMRC on overpaid output tax paid on demonstrator bonuses?
By Andrew Needham, February 2023