This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the value of import VAT due based on payments made to suppliers or the value of goods actually imported?

By Andrew Needham, July 2025

Summary 

The appellant appealed to the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) against a demand made by HMRC for import VAT of £121,321.93. The appellant's principal ground of appeal was that although it made payments to its supplier in excess of the declared import value of the goods, these were advance payments made to secure a better price and were not for imports of specific goods. As such, according to the appellant, the additional import VAT sought by HMRC was not due. 

Background 

The Turkish factory supplying bottled water to the appellant started to request payment in advance, and the prices increased significantly. The appellant was also concerned about inflation in Turkey. The appellant therefore discussed with its supplier whether they could stop the price increases by making payments in advance. At the same time, the appellant wanted to increase its presence in the market and have a guaranteed

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for submitting her returns late?
By Andrew Needham, December 2024
Was the supply of prescription drugs and contraceptives a separate taxable supply or part of an exempt composite supply of healthcare?
By Andrew Needham, September 2024
When was interest due from upon a claim for bad debt relief?
By Andrew Needham, November 2021
Was the appellant acting as agent and eligible to use Onward Supply Relief?
By Andrew Needham, October 2021
Was input tax on the purchase of doors recoverable when it did not result in an onward taxable supply?
By Andrew Needham, July 2021