This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were two Land Rover Discovery vehicles subject to the self-supply when converted from commercial vehicles into cars?

By Andrew Needham, June 2024

Summary 

The appellant was a further education college providing courses of a ‘vocational’ nature funded primarily by the Skills Funding Agency (SFA), and the Education Funding Agency (EFA). HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) considered these to be non-business and following the CJEU's judgment in Lennartz C-97/90. HMRC's understanding of the position was that the appellant was entitled to reclaim the input tax incurred on the construction of Blocks 1 and 6 on its campus, in the percentage that its use related to these non-business activities. However, the appellant would subsequently be due to account for deemed output tax over the economic life of the blocks to the extent that their use was for 'non-business' purposes. 

Background 

In April 2014, the appellant's VAT advisor submitted a net claim in respect of over-declared output VAT for periods 04/10 to 01/14 minus

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were hair transplants a medical procedure or a cosmetic process?
By Andrew Needham, April 2025
Were Maga Marshmallows zero-rated food or standard-rated confectionary?
By Andrew Needham, June 2024
Was repayment supplement due on monies repaid to the appellant by HMRC or was repayment made within relevant period?
By Andrew Needham, February 2024
Were the appellants liable to a penalty and were personal liability notices appropriate?
By Andrew Needham, November 2023
Was The Supply Of Temporary Classrooms An Exempt Supply Of Land Or A Standard Rated Supply Of Movable Property?
By Andrew Needham, November 2018