This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Application to admit an appeal submitted 42 days late accepted by tribunal

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2023

A delay of 42 days in submitting an appeal against an SDLT assessment was considered to be both serious and significant, but on balance, the First-tier Tribunal was prepared in the circumstances to exercise its discretion to permit the appeal to be brought out of time. 

On 15 January 2021, the applicant purchased a property in Hampshire, and stamp duty land tax (SDLT) was paid on the basis that the full consideration was for a residential property. Subsequently, the transaction was reviewed by a firm of tax specialists (C), who concluded that the property had been misclassified. On 1 April 2021, an amended SDLT return was submitted to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) on the applicant’s behalf, pursuant to which it was claimed part of the purchase price (attributable to 12 acres of mature woodland) should have been reclassified as non-residential property for SDLT purposes. 

Following an enquiry, HMRC amended the amended return, such that

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Property did not comprise a mixture of residential and non-residential property
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026
Acquisitions of apartment and storage unit were separate but linked transactions and non-residential SDLT rates applied
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Paddock was not part of the grounds of a dwelling house
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024
HMRC’s SDLT discovery assessment was validly made
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
The consideration for residential property did not include the grant of an annuity
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021