This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Construction industry scheme: CIS returns were not deliberately inaccurate for penalty purposes

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2019

The appellant’s appeal against a personal liability notice in respect of penalties imposed on a company for inaccuracies in its CIS returns was allowed as HMRC was unable to establish that the inaccuracies were deliberate.  
 
The appellant was a director shareholder of a company (S), which was within the construction industry scheme (CIS). In February 2016, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) officers undertook a compliance visit at S’s business premises. During the visit, HMRC put it to the appellant and S’s finance director (CS) that S had been making payments to various companies without deducting CIS tax. The appellant and CS freely admitted that this was the case and stated it had been their understanding that the CIS did not apply to payments made to ‘umbrella’ or service companies rather than to subcontractors directly.  
 
HMRC advised S that its gross payment status under

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Trade was carried on commercially but not with a view to the realisation of profits
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025
No ‘reasonable grounds’ to justify an application to postpone tax
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
Ignorance of the law was reasonable excuse for failing to notify liability to the high-income child benefit charge
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
Application for a preliminary hearing about the appellant’s domicile was dismissed.
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
LLPs were trading and were carrying on a trade with a view to profit
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021