This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Ignorance of the law was reasonable excuse for failing to notify liability to the high-income child benefit charge

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023

The taxpayer’s ignorance of his requirement to notify HMRC of liability to the high-income child benefit charge was a reasonable excuse for his failure to do so, and his appeal against a late notification penalty was allowed. 

The appellant’s income for the tax years 2018/19 and 2019/20 was £61,230 and £56,342, respectively. For both tax years, the appellant was an employee and outside the self-assessment regime. In December 2019, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued a ‘nudge’ letter, which was addressed to the appellant at 135 Ellesmere Road, Shrewsbury. The nudge letter explained HMRC wanted to help the taxpayer to understand whether he needed to pay the high-income child benefit charge (HICBC), the financial circumstances where a taxpayer might be liable to pay the charge, what to do next, and that if a taxpayer was not sure if they needed to pay the charge, the taxpayer should phone HMRC for assistance. 

>
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Taxpayer initially had reasonable excuse for late tax return but the failure was not remedied without unreasonable delay
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2024
Discovery assessments were made to HMRC’s best judgement but disclosure was unprompted
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2024
Replacement discovery assessments did not displace previous assessments
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021
Reliance on professional advice was a reasonable excuse for late claim for lifetime allowance enhanced protection
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2021
Construction industry scheme: CIS returns were not deliberately inaccurate for penalty purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2019