This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Jersey companies were centrally managed and controlled in the UK and not in Jersey

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021

The Court of Appeal considered that the Upper Tribunal was not justified in setting aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal for the reasons it gave and allowed the appeal of HMRC to the effect that the central management and control of Jersey companies was exercised in the UK and not Jersey.   

Summary 

The Court of Appeal considered that the Upper Tribunal (UT) was not justified in setting aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) for the reasons it gave and allowed the appeal of HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to the effect that the central management and control (CMC) of Jersey companies was exercised in the UK and not Jersey.   

Background 

In October 2014, HMRC denied the respondent companies various capital

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company was entitled to R&D credit as its project satisfied the relevant guidelines
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2024
Company did not meet R&D project tests and failed to prove sums claimed were spent on the project
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Warehouse to store potatoes for crisp manufacturers was plant
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021
Satellite launch costs were not eligible for capital allowances
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021
The ‘business in question’ was carried on by a related party before 1 April 2002
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020