This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were powdered drink concentrates food or standard-rated sports drinks?

By Andrew Needham, March 2025

The appellant imports, distributes and sells organic products in the UK. These include powdered vegan food supplements under the brands ‘Sunwarrior’ and ‘Hemple’. The appellant filed an error correction notification requesting a repayment of output tax overdeclared between 1 October 2016 and 30 September 2020, totalling £1,246,566.08, on the basis that certain products, including those sold under the Sunwarrior and Hemple brands, were properly zero-rated as food. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) agreed that the Hemple products were zero-rated but held that the Sunwarrior products were ‘sports drinks’ and therefore standard-rated under excepted Item 4A at Group 1 of Schedule 8 to VATA 1994. The appellant appealed this decision. 

The appellant submitted that a product would only fall within Item 4A if it was: 

  1. a "sports drink"; 

    Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
    to the Tax Case Library.
    14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
    Subscribe

    Related or similar articles

    Were the supplies made by the appellant exempt supplies of domiciliary care or standard-rated supplies of staff subject to the reverse charge?
    By Andrew Needham, April 2026
    Was the supply of fuel with plant hire a single composite supply or a multiple supply?
    By Andrew Needham, January 2025
    Did the input tax claimed by the appellant have a direct and immediate link to the making of taxable supplies?
    By Andrew Needham, November 2024
    Was the description of the services provided sufficient to fulfil the legal requirements?
    By Andrew Needham, July 2024
    Were Maga Marshmallows zero-rated food or standard-rated confectionary?
    By Andrew Needham, June 2024