This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Compensation received due to mis-selling of interest rate hedging products was taxable income

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2024

Bank compensation for the mis-selling of interest rate hedging products received by the taxpayers as basic redress and interest payments was property and investment income, respectively.  

The appellants (brothers) ran a property rental business. In January and May 2006, the appellants jointly purchased two interest rate hedging products (IRHPs) from HSBC. In August 2006, the appellants jointly purchased an IRHP from RBS. In a document dated 17 January 2014, RBS calculated interest at that stage of £59,030.01. However, on 20 October 2016, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) wrote to the appellants indicating the gross interest figure was £65,173.76. The appellants disputed the principle of chargeability to tax (but not the figure of £65,173.76). HMRC subsequently issued closure notices amending each appellant’s self-assessment returns for the tax year 2014/15, relating to the chargeability to income tax said to be due on: (a) &lsquo

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Personal expenses paid through a director’s loan account represented an extraction of value
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024
HMRC’s decision to impose late payment penalties was flawed
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Share options were acquired at the date of grant and not when the shares vested
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2022
Enterprise investment scheme: Shares carried a preferential right to dividends
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2020
Contractor liable for amounts not deducted from payments to subcontractors but accounted for by them
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2020